Abstract
The article analyses current debates on securitization theory. It is argued that there are a number of concepts of politics in play and that greater awareness regarding these conceptual differences helps clarify not only theoretical differences but also the possibilities for new theoretical development and reflection. Three conversations on politics are identified: first, how politics concerns action and intentionality; second, the modern organization of politics, spheres and sectors; and, third, the relationship between politics, ethics and science. Where the first and third conversations refer to politics as an act, in the second politics is inherently tied to the institutional or spatial structures of government – the state, the public, the political field, spheres, sectors or function.
| Original language | Norwegian |
|---|---|
| Journal | Internasjonal Politikk |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 329-352 |
| ISSN | 0020-577X |
| Publication status | Published - 6 Sept 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver