Abstract
Dialogue is key to building trust and legitimacy around US military bases. A comparison of the bases in Okinawa and Thule reveals that the outcome of such dialogues is shaped by who is included in the conversation. Involving regional governments can enhance inclusivity but lead to political instability, while relying on central authorities may offer stability but at the cost of excluding local communities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Copenhagen |
| Publisher | Danish Institute for International Studies |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Publication status | Published - 25 Aug 2025 |
| Series | DIIS Policy Brief |
|---|
Keywords
- Arctic
- Thule
- Indo-Pacific
- USA
- Bases
- Okinawa
Research output
- 1 Policy Briefs, Briefs and Impacts
-
Amerikamiut Okinawami Pituffimmilu Sakkutooqarfii: Isummersoqatigiissutigineqassappat imaluunniit naamik?
Takahashi, M. & Gad, U. P., 3 Sept 2025, Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, 9 p. (DIIS Policy Brief).Translated title of the contribution :Okinawa and Thule US military bases To dialogue or not to dialogue: To dialogue or not to dialogue Research output: Working Paper, Paper, Policy Brief, Brief, Impact › Policy Briefs, Briefs and Impacts › Research
Open AccessFile
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver