Abstract
This reply to the Symposium on Stefano Guzzini (ed.) The return of geopolitics in Europe?, answers the criticisms by John Agnew, Jeffrey Checkel, Dan Deudney and Jennifer Mitzen. It justifies (1) its specific definition and critique of geopolitics as a theory – and not just a foreign policy strategy; (2) its proposed interpretivist process tracing; (3) the role of mechanisms in constructivist theorizing and foreign policy theory; and (4) its usage of non-Humean causality in the analysis of multiple parallel processes and their interaction. At the same time, it develops the logic of the book’s main mechanism of foreign policy identity crisis reduction.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Cooperation and Conflict |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 423-445 |
| ISSN | 0010-8367 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- Constructivism
- Geopolitics
- Social mechanisms
- European security
- Identity
- Causation
- Foreign Policy Analysis
- Process-tracing
- Interpretivism