Abstract
In crisis-hit countries, intensive risk management increasingly characterizes the presence of international interveners, with measures ranging from fortified compounds to ‘remote programming’. This article investigates the global drive for ‘security’ from an ethnographic perspective, focusing on Afghanistan and Mali. By deploying the concepts of distance and proximity, the article shows how frontline ‘outsourcing’ and bunkering have generated an unequal ‘risk economy’ while distancing interveners from local society in a trend that itself generates novel risks. To conclude, the article asks whether alternative forms of proximity may help to break the vicious cycle of danger and distance at work in today’s crisis zones.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 519-541 |
| ISSN | 1750-2977 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Jul 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- International intervention
- Security
- Risk management
- Remote management
- Bunkerization
- Peacekeeping
- International organizations
- Afghanistan
- Mali