TY - JOUR
T1 - Gatekeeping the Greenland ice sheet
T2 - climate change data and the “upstream” production of global governance objects
AU - Mortensgaard, Lin Alexandra
PY - 2025/10/22
Y1 - 2025/10/22
N2 - In this article, I develop the concept of “gatekeeping” as it is exerted in the “upstream”of knowledge production. “Upstream” denotes the stage of knowledge productionwhere unprocessed data is scoped, extracted, and preliminarily analyzed, before it later—“downstream”—is published as results on the basis of which political decisions are made.The focus on the upstream of knowledge production and how it is gatekept is an argumentto prompt theoretical work on global governance objects to pay attention to the physicaldata that underlies the formation of epistemic objects. Moreover, the concept of gatekeepingspeaks to scholarship concerned with data sovereignty by showing how gatekeeping as amechanism of control of raw climate data is also exerted by non-sovereign actors or bymultiple state actors simultaneously. By following climate scientists around as they scope,extract, and analyze ice cores from the Greenland ice sheet, I show how climate science isfull of institutional hierarchies, mutually exclusive scientific interests, and power struggles“inside” science with direct effects on the flow and content of knowledge produced.Conceptualizing gatekeeping as it is exerted by state actors and scientific institutionscontributes to our understanding of how power, hierarchy, and political interests areimprinted on climate science from the point of extraction of its physical data. The articlefollows ice core science ethnographically and asks how and by whom data is extracted fromthe Greenland ice sheet, building on participant observation and semi-structured interviewsduring multi-sited fieldwork across Greenland, Germany, and Denmark.
AB - In this article, I develop the concept of “gatekeeping” as it is exerted in the “upstream”of knowledge production. “Upstream” denotes the stage of knowledge productionwhere unprocessed data is scoped, extracted, and preliminarily analyzed, before it later—“downstream”—is published as results on the basis of which political decisions are made.The focus on the upstream of knowledge production and how it is gatekept is an argumentto prompt theoretical work on global governance objects to pay attention to the physicaldata that underlies the formation of epistemic objects. Moreover, the concept of gatekeepingspeaks to scholarship concerned with data sovereignty by showing how gatekeeping as amechanism of control of raw climate data is also exerted by non-sovereign actors or bymultiple state actors simultaneously. By following climate scientists around as they scope,extract, and analyze ice cores from the Greenland ice sheet, I show how climate science isfull of institutional hierarchies, mutually exclusive scientific interests, and power struggles“inside” science with direct effects on the flow and content of knowledge produced.Conceptualizing gatekeeping as it is exerted by state actors and scientific institutionscontributes to our understanding of how power, hierarchy, and political interests areimprinted on climate science from the point of extraction of its physical data. The articlefollows ice core science ethnographically and asks how and by whom data is extracted fromthe Greenland ice sheet, building on participant observation and semi-structured interviewsduring multi-sited fieldwork across Greenland, Germany, and Denmark.
KW - Global government objects
KW - Climate science
KW - Arctic
KW - Greenland
KW - Gatekeeping
KW - Science and technology
UR - https://www.diis.dk/node/27939
U2 - 10.1177/13540661251377177
DO - 10.1177/13540661251377177
M3 - Journal Article
SN - 1354-0661
JO - European Journal of International Relations
JF - European Journal of International Relations
ER -