Abstract
Research on security and governance is not racing to keep track with the rapid changes in both politics and climate in the Arctic. It also suffers from a disconnect between studies and research agendas driven by policy and theoretical interest respectively.
As a contribution to developing a research agenda for the International Polar Year 2032-33, this chapter in the book A Research Agenda for Arctic Security and Governance argues the importance of identifying entanglements across environmental, geopolitical, and postcolonial dynamics when trying to understand Arctic security.
The argument is illustrated through the example of Greenland and further emphasises how theories of security and regions should better account for the unique materiality and transitional sovereignties that are unique to the Arctic.
As a contribution to developing a research agenda for the International Polar Year 2032-33, this chapter in the book A Research Agenda for Arctic Security and Governance argues the importance of identifying entanglements across environmental, geopolitical, and postcolonial dynamics when trying to understand Arctic security.
The argument is illustrated through the example of Greenland and further emphasises how theories of security and regions should better account for the unique materiality and transitional sovereignties that are unique to the Arctic.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | A Research Agenda for Arctic Security and Governance |
| Editors | Marc Jacobsen, Elana Wilson Rowe |
| Publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing |
| Publication date | Feb 2026 |
| Pages | 119-134 |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2026 |
Keywords
- Arctic
- Greenland
- Security
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver