Abstract
This paper challenges the monolithic portrayal of the state as inherently ‘bad’ when it comes to implementation of Indigenous rights. Offering a comparative analysis of case studies from four continents we demonstrate examples of frontline state officials proactively advancing Indigenous rights to land and environment. Combining distinct literatures on institutional theory, we develop an analytical framework that sheds light on bureaucratic agency within state-Indigenous relations. The findings show how government organizations maintain a broadly colonial agenda, but that officials on the inside sometimes manage to advance decolonizing or otherwise supportive actions. We propose the concept of institutional braiding to describe this agency exerted by
state officials in collaboration with Indigenous representatives when navigating coexisting normative orders. By examining the fraught institutional constraints faced by frontline actors, we contribute to debates on Indigenous-state relations and the prospects of reaching common ground in the contact zone between divergent ontologies.
state officials in collaboration with Indigenous representatives when navigating coexisting normative orders. By examining the fraught institutional constraints faced by frontline actors, we contribute to debates on Indigenous-state relations and the prospects of reaching common ground in the contact zone between divergent ontologies.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Earth System Governance |
| Vol/bind | 25 |
| Antal sider | 11 |
| ISSN | 2589-8116 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 23 jun. 2025 |
Projekter
- 1 Afsluttet
-
RARE: Rights and Resilience in Kenya
Funder, M. (CoI)
01/11/2018 → 31/12/2023
Projekter: Projekt › Forskning
Citationsformater
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver